Tuesday, April 5, 2011

New York Times and Goldstone

You would think that an op-ed by internationally recognized jurist Richard Goldstone would be of interest to New York Times readers.

I guess not.
Posted by at

1 comment:

  1. Marnie TunayApril 24, 2011 at 9:14 PM

    The Times says the piece Goldstone submitted to them was significantly different from the one that was published in the Washington Post, and, that the former "did not include the "crucial repudiation of the report's central thrust.""

    What does Goldstone say about the Times' remarks?

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)